Dairy Programs in Merced County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 152
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Merced County, California totaled $18,005,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | River Rock Ranch LLC | Merced, CA 95341 | $164,644 |
22 | Dores Dairy Ptn | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $151,107 |
23 | Manuel & Maria Cardoso & Sons Dairy Ltd | Delhi, CA 95315 | $127,173 |
24 | Frank Coelho & Sons Lp | El Nido, CA 95317 | $127,173 |
25 | Hillcrest Dairy Lp | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $127,173 |
26 | Dutch Door Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $127,173 |
27 | Diamond J Dairy LLC | Merced, CA 95341 | $127,173 |
28 | De Jager Farms South | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $127,173 |
29 | Red Rock Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $127,173 |
30 | Tony L Lopes Dairy Lp | Gustine, CA 95322 | $127,173 |
31 | Rockshar Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $127,173 |
32 | Sierra Vista Dairy Lp | Denair, CA 95316 | $127,173 |
33 | Five H Farms | Merced, CA 95341 | $127,173 |
34 | Dennis Nunes | Gustine, CA 95322 | $127,173 |
35 | Souza Brothers Dairy | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $127,173 |
36 | Joe O Rocha Dairy Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $127,173 |
37 | Den K Holsteins Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $127,173 |
38 | Martins Bros Dairy Farms Gp | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $127,173 |
39 | Bobby Borba Dba Dairy Central | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $127,173 |
40 | Hath Dairy | El Nido, CA 95317 | $127,173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”