Farm Subsidy information
Merced County, California
Total Subsidies in Merced County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,530
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Merced County, California totaled $839,159,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William Sloan Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,069,937 |
42 | Talbott Sheep Company LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,063,584 |
43 | Bowles Farming Company Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,060,572 |
44 | Vander Woude Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $2,016,240 |
45 | Wickstrom Jersey Farms Inc | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $1,999,787 |
46 | Pafford Farms | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $1,987,987 |
47 | B & L Farming | Merced, CA 95341 | $1,927,831 |
48 | Live Oak Farms Lp | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $1,913,466 |
49 | Fagundes Fagundes Fagundes | Merced, CA 95348 | $1,908,299 |
50 | John B Pires And Eldred C Pires Ptr | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,879,675 |
51 | Vaz Dairy | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,879,545 |
52 | Paul Vanwarmerdam | Winton, CA 95388 | $1,837,234 |
53 | Sherman Dairy | Winton, CA 95388 | $1,832,595 |
54 | Bar-mac Dairy | Merced, CA 95340 | $1,811,706 |
55 | Godinho Dairy L.p. | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,800,316 |
56 | O'banion Ranches | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $1,796,470 |
57 | Palazzo Farming Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,788,504 |
58 | De Jong Brothers Dairy Gp | Ballico, CA 95303 | $1,775,359 |
59 | Manuel R Goncalves Jr. | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $1,764,689 |
60 | J P M Ag | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,750,081 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”