Farm Subsidy information
Merced County, California
Total Subsidies in Merced County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 835
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Merced County, California totaled $40,871,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | J P M Ag | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $178,370 |
| 42 | Bradford Nyman | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $177,829 |
| 43 | Vaz Dairy | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $175,442 |
| 44 | S J R Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $173,651 |
| 45 | Frank Coelho & Sons Lp | El Nido, CA 95317 | $172,846 |
| 46 | Blue Sky Dairy Lp | Atwater, CA 95301 | $171,486 |
| 47 | Vista Verde Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $170,694 |
| 48 | De Jager Farms South | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $169,405 |
| 49 | Mike & Wendy Vander Dussen | El Nido, CA 95317 | $168,567 |
| 50 | Martins Bros Dairy Farms Gp | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $166,897 |
| 51 | Bettencourt & Marson Dairy | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $165,563 |
| 52 | John & Vicky Seasholtz | Fresno, CA 93705 | $164,637 |
| 53 | Rodney De Jager | Merced, CA 95341 | $162,696 |
| 54 | Sharlene De Jager | Merced, CA 95341 | $162,696 |
| 55 | Wl Goodman & Sons | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $162,394 |
| 56 | Alexandrina Azevedo | El Nido, CA 95317 | $162,026 |
| 57 | Antonio Azevedo | El Nido, CA 95317 | $162,026 |
| 58 | De Jong Brothers Dairy Gp | Ballico, CA 95303 | $161,412 |
| 59 | P H Ranch | Winton, CA 95388 | $160,797 |
| 60 | Manuel R Goncalves Jr. | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $160,497 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf