Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 216
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $7,985,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Odete Nunes | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $61,113 |
42 | Manuel R Goncalves Jr. | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $58,622 |
43 | Bliss Farms LLC | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $55,708 |
44 | Jp Souza Farms | Gustine, CA 95322 | $55,516 |
45 | Pedretti Ranches Inc | El Nido, CA 95317 | $54,171 |
46 | Billy Grissom Fertilizer Spreadin | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $54,007 |
47 | Hoogendam Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $53,163 |
48 | Christiana Santa Rita | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $50,718 |
49 | Matos Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $50,357 |
50 | Manuel Mendes | Gustine, CA 95322 | $47,369 |
51 | Bob Teicheira Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $47,026 |
52 | O L Dairy Agp | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $44,994 |
53 | Silveira Dairy Inc | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $43,808 |
54 | 4-w Ranch | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $43,653 |
55 | Nunes Bros Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $43,432 |
56 | John F Toste | Newman, CA 95360 | $43,147 |
57 | Antonio & Filomena Nunes Jv | Merced, CA 95341 | $42,716 |
58 | Emanuel A Belo Dairy | Atwater, CA 95301 | $40,615 |
59 | Vander Woude Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $39,729 |
60 | Soares Dairy Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $39,697 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”