Conservation Reserve Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 45
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $2,937,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tracy Duck Club Inc | Newman, CA 95360 | $40,977 |
22 | Lost & Found Cattle Co | Gustine, CA 95322 | $37,733 |
23 | Lonesome Duck Club | Salinas, CA 93908 | $36,422 |
24 | Mar Land & Cattle | Sonora, CA 95370 | $31,038 |
25 | Doc's Palace Inc | San Ramon, CA 94583 | $29,632 |
26 | Zimmerman Duck Club Gp | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $24,386 |
27 | Chester N Vogt | Elk Creek, CA 95939 | $22,800 |
28 | Charles Fisher | Royal Oaks, CA 95076 | $22,153 |
29 | Ray Mallonee | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $16,232 |
30 | J E Wiley | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $16,232 |
31 | Gary Cook | Santa Clara, CA 95051 | $4,298 |
32 | Jim Sharpe | Granite Bay, CA 95746 | $2,648 |
33 | Bruce Bettencourt | Santa Cruz, CA 95065 | $2,317 |
34 | Jack Brumit | Quincy, CA 95971 | $2,316 |
35 | Anne Lise Thuse | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $1,986 |
36 | Howard Robinson | Aptos, CA 95003 | $1,655 |
37 | William Mc Afee | Monterey, CA 93940 | $1,320 |
38 | Jim Lerch | Rocklin, CA 95765 | $1,320 |
39 | Scott Carpenter | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $1,320 |
40 | Craig Robinson | Stateline, NV 89449 | $827 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”