Total Commodity Programs in Modoc County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 261
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Modoc County, California totaled $2,881,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Amanda Dee Havard | Forest, MS 39074 | $20,139 |
42 | Hapgood Ranch | Lake City, CA 96115 | $18,322 |
43 | Absher Land & Livestock Inc | Hughson, CA 95326 | $18,175 |
44 | Delyle D Diaz | Merrill, OR 97633 | $17,889 |
45 | Conner Jay Hartman | Malin, OR 97632 | $17,752 |
46 | Scott Farms Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $17,683 |
47 | Sandra L Kidner Brown | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $17,450 |
48 | Robert Stayer | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $17,352 |
49 | The Copp Family Trust | Adin, CA 96006 | $16,929 |
50 | Alice Johnson Revocable Trust | Malin, OR 97632 | $16,837 |
51 | Ralb Corporation | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $15,959 |
52 | Daniel G Chin Dba Chin Farms | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $15,529 |
53 | Lawson Ranch Inc | New Pine Creek, OR 97635 | $15,489 |
54 | Fee Ranch Inc | Fort Bidwell, CA 96112 | $15,312 |
55 | Patricia Rogers | Lookout, CA 96054 | $15,032 |
56 | Laurence G Bagg | Malin, OR 97632 | $14,757 |
57 | Nick Macy | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $14,587 |
58 | Russell Peterson | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $14,520 |
59 | Tim J Peterson | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $14,202 |
60 | Robert W Bushey Jr | Canby, CA 96015 | $13,824 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”