Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Modoc County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 243
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Modoc County, California totaled $7,851,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Marvin G Cardoza | Lookout, CA 96054 | $20,903 |
82 | Gary Monchamp Inc | Lookout, CA 96054 | $20,460 |
83 | Nick Macy | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $20,161 |
84 | Jesse Garland Freeman | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $20,061 |
85 | Adair Brown | Davis Creek, CA 96108 | $19,965 |
86 | Rodney E Barnes | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $18,947 |
87 | C David Demulder | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $18,633 |
88 | Jeffrey R Boyd | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $18,533 |
89 | Hagge Ranch Inc | Alturas, CA 96101 | $18,153 |
90 | Manuel Souza | Catheys Valley, CA 95306 | $18,150 |
91 | Paul Dolby | Alturas, CA 96101 | $18,124 |
92 | William T Deforest | Adin, CA 96006 | $17,985 |
93 | Terrance R Breiner | Alturas, CA 96101 | $17,710 |
94 | Ed Hill | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $17,503 |
95 | Spencer Smith | Ft Bidwell, CA 96112 | $17,266 |
96 | Matthew Roberson | Los Gatos, CA 95032 | $17,128 |
97 | Patricia Rogers | Lookout, CA 96054 | $17,072 |
98 | Florence Bordwell | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $16,962 |
99 | Robert H Mackey & Sons Inc | Alturas, CA 96101 | $16,548 |
100 | Mcgarva Ranch Range Division | Likely, CA 96116 | $16,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”