Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Modoc County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 153
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Modoc County, California totaled $1,088,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Rodney R Flournoy | Likely, CA 96116 | $2,583 |
82 | Scott Wade Ellis | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $2,509 |
83 | Hapgood Ranch | Lake City, CA 96115 | $2,500 |
84 | Robert H Mackey & Sons Inc | Alturas, CA 96101 | $2,479 |
85 | Thomas Robert Cockrell | Eagleville, CA 96110 | $2,463 |
86 | Je Baley Organic | Malin, OR 97632 | $2,447 |
87 | Herb Jasper | New Pine Creek, OR 97635 | $2,426 |
88 | Yellow Wing Properties LLC | Alturas, CA 96101 | $2,422 |
89 | Carl D Quigley | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $2,393 |
90 | Ronald L Schluter II | Alturas, CA 96101 | $2,392 |
91 | Wyatt J. Valena | Alturas, CA 96101 | $2,381 |
92 | Carlos Martin Reyes | Brooks, CA 95606 | $2,305 |
93 | Roman Reyes | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $2,251 |
94 | Michael Scott Bushey | Canby, CA 96015 | $2,196 |
95 | Kyle J Lyman | Merrill, OR 97633 | $2,174 |
96 | Alan Nelson | Adin, CA 96006 | $2,043 |
97 | Florence Bordwell | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $2,032 |
98 | Richard Murphy | Bodega, CA 94922 | $1,925 |
99 | Jorge Chevez | Lookout, CA 96054 | $1,925 |
100 | Richard A Darst | Lake City, CA 96115 | $1,822 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”