Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Monterey County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 65
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $462,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R & R Berry Farms Inc | Castroville, CA 93907 | $9,418 |
22 | Maria G. Fuentes Dba Lg Organic F | Salinas, CA 93906 | $8,642 |
23 | Armando Martinez | Greenfield, CA 93927 | $7,584 |
24 | , | $7,110 | |
25 | Pajaro Valley Farm LLC | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $6,270 |
26 | Grigory Ranch LLC | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $5,503 |
27 | Orlando Diaz Jr Andrade | Salinas, CA 93906 | $5,067 |
28 | Domitila Tapia Narez | Salinas, CA 93905 | $4,866 |
29 | Maria Teresa Cisneros Lopez Dba F | Soledad, CA 93960 | $4,084 |
30 | Enrique Ramirez Garcia | Salinas, CA 93907 | $3,411 |
31 | Kimberly Botts | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $2,756 |
32 | John P Doud | Greenfield, CA 93927 | $2,483 |
33 | , | $2,481 | |
34 | Robin L Rist | King City, CA 93930 | $2,401 |
35 | Anita L Settrini | Salinas, CA 93906 | $2,211 |
36 | Alvaro Acosta | Salinas, CA 93906 | $2,199 |
37 | Rigoberto Bucio-estrada | Salinas, CA 93905 | $1,957 |
38 | Linda Y Ferrasci | Carmel Valley, CA 93924 | $1,819 |
39 | Cecilia Rojas Gonzalez | Salinas, CA 93905 | $1,673 |
40 | Rodriguez Farms Inc | Watsonville, CA 95077 | $1,651 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”