Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Monterey County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 189
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $19,868,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Costa Farms Inc | Soledad, CA 93960 | $166,403 |
42 | Seven Livestock Company LLC | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $139,236 |
43 | Be Berry Farms LLC | Salinas, CA 93907 | $131,952 |
44 | Jon Wooster | San Lucas, CA 93954 | $128,674 |
45 | Rosenberg Family Ranch LLC | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $112,782 |
46 | Sun Valley Berries LLC | Watsonville, CA 95077 | $107,645 |
47 | Overseas Livestock Services Inc Dba Livestock Serv | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $103,383 |
48 | Gema Berry Farms Inc | Westlake Village, CA 91361 | $103,039 |
49 | Jsm Organics, Inc. | Aromas, CA 95004 | $100,519 |
50 | Henry Hibino Farms, LLC | Salinas, CA 93907 | $100,000 |
51 | Alejandro Ramirez-castillo Dba Ra | Salinas, CA 93907 | $92,017 |
52 | Thomas Berrelleza | Aromas, CA 95004 | $90,883 |
53 | David Azevedo | Salinas, CA 93908 | $89,266 |
54 | Adolfo Campos Jr Dba Cypress Berr | Salinas, CA 93906 | $82,239 |
55 | Adalberto Vasquez Dba Adalberto V | Salinas, CA 93907 | $78,821 |
56 | Pacific Berry Farms LLC | Salinas, CA 93907 | $78,365 |
57 | Visionary Vegetables LLC | Salinas, CA 93901 | $76,077 |
58 | A F Silveira & Sons LLC | King City, CA 93930 | $68,113 |
59 | Franscioni Lemon Company | Soledad, CA 93960 | $65,895 |
60 | Jal Berry Farms LLC | Aromas, CA 95004 | $65,685 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”