Market Loss Assistance Program in Monterey County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 197
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $1,543,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Alvin Bray | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $4,650 |
62 | Jessie L Patterson | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $4,450 |
63 | Robert Paulsen | The Dalles, OR 97058 | $4,387 |
64 | Robert Edrington | Bradley, CA 93426 | $4,343 |
65 | Ray E Harden | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $4,295 |
66 | Randy Douglas | Goleta, CA 93116 | $4,218 |
67 | Nino Ranch LLC | King City, CA 93930 | $4,102 |
68 | Barbree Ranch Inc | San Lucas, CA 93954 | $4,077 |
69 | Oak Creek Apple Ranch Gp | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $4,039 |
70 | Mary Lynn Tindall-young | Magalia, CA 95954 | $3,902 |
71 | Copley Cattle Co | King City, CA 93930 | $3,879 |
72 | Delmar Deis Revocable Trust | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $3,696 |
73 | Stan Clark Revocable Trust | Bradley, CA 93426 | $3,673 |
74 | Gst Exemption Trust And Qtip Trus | Waxhaw, NC 28173 | $3,608 |
75 | Daniel A Mainini | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $3,541 |
76 | Ben Hartman | Goleta, CA 93117 | $3,501 |
77 | Mike Mcghee | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $3,379 |
78 | Mike Bernal | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $3,323 |
79 | Buttle Properties Revocable Trust | Bradley, CA 93426 | $3,223 |
80 | Raymond E Gillett | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $3,222 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”