Direct Payment Program in Monterey County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 169
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $2,438,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Neil C Sorensen | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $2,237 |
102 | Tony Carvalho Revocable Trust | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $2,209 |
103 | James S Batson | Parkfield, CA 93451 | $2,101 |
104 | Benton Sherman Demaree | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $2,074 |
105 | Burton James Barrington | King City, CA 93930 | $2,038 |
106 | Johna Hurl | Shandon, CA 93461 | $1,908 |
107 | John O Varian | Parkfield, CA 93451 | $1,876 |
108 | Camany Family Trust | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $1,850 |
109 | James E Weferling Estate | Richardton, ND 58652 | $1,822 |
110 | Stephen Hanson | Beaverton, OR 97006 | $1,811 |
111 | Terry And Betty Buttle Revocable | Salinas, CA 93901 | $1,718 |
112 | Redwings Horse Sanctuary | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $1,692 |
113 | M V Merritt Irrev Trust | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $1,613 |
114 | Pebble Beach Ranches LLC | King City, CA 93930 | $1,552 |
115 | Marjorie G Miller | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $1,538 |
116 | Robert Grab | King City, CA 93930 | $1,528 |
117 | Mary Lynn Tindall-young | Magalia, CA 95954 | $1,453 |
118 | Edwin H Copley | King City, CA 93930 | $1,451 |
119 | Patricia Copley | King City, CA 93930 | $1,451 |
120 | Thomas Brown | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $1,398 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”