Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Monterey County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 212
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $1,642,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas Bert Davi | Salinas, CA 93908 | $7,126 |
42 | Ray Mcdonnell | Marina, CA 93933 | $5,535 |
43 | Jsm Organics, Inc. | Aromas, CA 95004 | $4,975 |
44 | Maria G Narez Mendoza | Salinas, CA 93905 | $4,943 |
45 | Giovanni Nevoloso | Seaside, CA 93955 | $4,903 |
46 | Walter Scott Deyerle | Pacific Grove, CA 93950 | $4,572 |
47 | Peter Cong Nguyen | Salinas, CA 93905 | $4,262 |
48 | Deon M Calamia | Marina, CA 93933 | $3,774 |
49 | Domitila Tapia Narez | Salinas, CA 93905 | $3,581 |
50 | Michael G Ricketts | Carmel Valley, CA 93924 | $3,553 |
51 | Tai Tan Huynh | Marina, CA 93933 | $3,026 |
52 | , | $2,919 | |
53 | Thomas Kahlow | Pacific Grove, CA 93950 | $2,879 |
54 | Wilson Quick | Aromas, CA 95004 | $2,859 |
55 | Yamashita Inc | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $2,817 |
56 | Rincon Farms Inc | Gonzales, CA 93926 | $2,672 |
57 | Christopher Michael Seeno | Seaside, CA 93955 | $2,566 |
58 | Dai T Do | Salinas, CA 93905 | $2,347 |
59 | Khinh Duy Le | Marina, CA 93933 | $1,928 |
60 | Richard Van Nguyen | Salinas, CA 93906 | $1,829 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”