Total Disaster Programs in Monterey County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 728
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $51,651,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Work Ranch LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $455,583 |
22 | , | $450,075 | |
23 | Simonin Livestock Gp | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $443,345 |
24 | Ronald W Bernard | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $426,897 |
25 | The Anthony L. Lombardo Separate | Salinas, CA 93902 | $400,616 |
26 | Juan And Elodida Garcilazo Jv | Salinas, CA 93906 | $397,478 |
27 | Miller Bros Gp | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $396,700 |
28 | Michael R Strouss | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $393,423 |
29 | John P Doud | Greenfield, CA 93927 | $385,869 |
30 | Sun Coast Growers Dba | Salinas, CA 93915 | $375,605 |
31 | Ruvalcaba Nursery Dba | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $340,472 |
32 | Jesus Guzman | Salinas, CA 93906 | $313,177 |
33 | Douglas H Thomason | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $305,672 |
34 | Pierre Camsuzou | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $304,209 |
35 | Cnh Partners LLC | Salinas, CA 93902 | $299,133 |
36 | Mike M Mallory | King City, CA 93930 | $295,399 |
37 | Jsm Organics, Inc. | Aromas, CA 95004 | $286,124 |
38 | Ramon Narez | Salinas, CA 93905 | $285,176 |
39 | Miller Bros Cattle Gp | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $279,601 |
40 | Thomas R Martinus | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $278,929 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”