Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Napa County, California, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 145

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Napa County, California totaled $8,184,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2021
21Garvey III LLCSaint Helena, CA 94574$100,577
22Snowden Vineyards LLCNapa, CA 94558$95,165
23Sleeping Lady LLCNapa, CA 94558$95,067
24Green Island Vineyards LLCNapa, CA 94558$94,891
25Robert NavoneNapa, CA 94558$94,348
26Ballentine RanchesSaint Helena, CA 94574$93,887
27Lorraine BoscheSan Francisco, CA 94118$88,813
28Sunshine Estate Investors LLCCalistoga, CA 94515$88,676
29Calness Vintners Dba Trio C VineyardNapa, CA 94558$81,978
30Mulvaney Meigs Ranch LLCPotter Valley, CA 95469$80,387
31Donald R Hardin TrustSaint Helena, CA 94574$79,971
32Yellow Clay Farm CoNapa, CA 94559$79,810
33David M BeattyAngwin, CA 94508$79,666
34Tench Vineyard Operations LLCNapa, CA 94558$78,117
35Madrone Knoll Vineyards LLCRutherford, CA 94573$75,215
36Lincoln-mondavi 6, LLCSaint Helena, CA 94574$69,374
37Lincoln-mondavi 72 LLCSaint Helena, CA 94574$69,374
38Jj Cohn Estate, LLCRutherford, CA 94573$68,825
39Bleecher Family TrustCalistoga, CA 94515$68,613
40Joseph Nichelini Ranches IncNapa, CA 94581$68,045

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag