Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Napa County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 234

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Napa County, California totaled $12,589,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
41Robert NavoneNapa, CA 94558$94,348
42Ballentine RanchesSaint Helena, CA 94574$93,887
43Sunshine Estate Investors LLCCalistoga, CA 94515$88,676
44Designs By Helene Inc.American Canyon, CA 94503$85,126
45Leonardini Family Winery LLCSaint Helena, CA 94574$82,760
46Calness Vintners Dba Trio C VineyardNapa, CA 94558$81,978
47Mulvaney Meigs Ranch LLCPotter Valley, CA 95469$80,387
48Donald R Hardin TrustSaint Helena, CA 94574$79,971
49Yellow Clay Farm CoNapa, CA 94559$79,810
50David M BeattyAngwin, CA 94508$79,666
51Tench Vineyard Operations LLCNapa, CA 94558$78,117
52Alfred L Abruzzini JrNapa, CA 94558$75,835
53Madrone Knoll Vineyards LLCRutherford, CA 94573$75,215
54D'ambrosio Vineyards IncNapa, CA 94558$74,788
55Matthiasson Family Vineyards LLCNapa, CA 94581$69,493
56Lincoln-mondavi 6, LLCSaint Helena, CA 94574$69,374
57Lincoln-mondavi 72 LLCSaint Helena, CA 94574$69,374
58Jj Cohn Estate, LLCRutherford, CA 94573$68,825
59Bleecher Family TrustCalistoga, CA 94515$68,613
60Joseph Nichelini Ranches IncNapa, CA 94581$68,045

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag