Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Napa County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 145
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Napa County, California totaled $8,184,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sydney Apartments Inc | Napa, CA 94558 | $67,851 |
42 | P & J Vineyards LLC | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $67,466 |
43 | Caldwell Vineyard | Napa, CA 94559 | $67,388 |
44 | M. Josephine Taddei Trust | Oakville, CA 94562 | $64,101 |
45 | Cm Vineyard LLC | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $63,587 |
46 | Big Ranch Farms LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $63,416 |
47 | Vincent Arroyo | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $61,879 |
48 | Herrick II Ranch LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $60,915 |
49 | Belgamia LLC | Napa, CA 94559 | $54,892 |
50 | Viader Vineyards & Winery Inc. | Deer Park, CA 94576 | $54,214 |
51 | Ted Surber | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $52,904 |
52 | Dutch Canyon LLC | Palo Alto, CA 94301 | $52,448 |
53 | Raymond E. Signorello | Napa, CA 94558 | $51,997 |
54 | E J Mcgah Pacheco Company Inc Barbara Trust Etal P | Alamo, CA 94507 | $51,295 |
55 | Zakin Family Vineyard LLC | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $51,241 |
56 | Oakville Hills Cellars, Inc | Napa, CA 94558 | $51,135 |
57 | Milat Ranch | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $49,942 |
58 | Rodeno Vineyards | Napa, CA 94558 | $49,752 |
59 | 1801 Pope Canyon Road, LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $46,374 |
60 | Soda Canyon Ranch Vineyards Inc | Napa, CA 94558 | $45,673 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”