Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Napa County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 145
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Napa County, California totaled $8,184,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Recurso LLC | Orinda, CA 94563 | $44,355 |
62 | Mondavi Vineyard Limited Partnership | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $44,034 |
63 | Maria Robledo | Napa, CA 94558 | $43,342 |
64 | Ddng, Inc. | Napa, CA 94558 | $42,920 |
65 | Lerner LLC | Walnut Creek, CA 94598 | $41,784 |
66 | Vangone Vineyards LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $41,151 |
67 | Herrick Grand III LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $41,117 |
68 | William Cole Vineyards LLC | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $41,050 |
69 | Lee Vineyards LLC | Napa, CA 94559 | $40,111 |
70 | Sandra D Cover Gst Exempt Tr | Palo Alto, CA 94301 | $40,106 |
71 | Marie-louise Garrett Gst Exempt Tr | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 | $40,106 |
72 | Kitchen Table LLC | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $39,408 |
73 | Wolleson Ranch | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $39,390 |
74 | Volker Eisele Family Estate LLC | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $38,689 |
75 | Rancho Sarco Vineyards | Napa, CA 94558 | $38,420 |
76 | Randall Wulff | Napa, CA 94558 | $37,428 |
77 | Sinskey Vineyards Inc | Napa, CA 94558 | $35,250 |
78 | Page Nord Vineyard LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $34,433 |
79 | Ddym, Inc. | Napa, CA 94558 | $33,840 |
80 | Trio Burmar | Napa, CA 94558 | $33,049 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”