Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Napa County, California, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 145

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Napa County, California totaled $8,184,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2021
81Charlie Wolleson Dba Wolleson VineyardsCalistoga, CA 94515$32,518
82Craig Battuello Family Vineyards II LLCSaint Helena, CA 94574$32,429
83Fmew, LLCCalistoga, CA 94515$31,771
84The Russel A Wight Revocable TrustSaint Helena, CA 95474$31,759
85John & Martha Komes Family TrustSaint Helena, CA 94574$31,463
86Red Hen PartnershipSaint Helena, CA 94574$30,607
87Evelyn AllenNapa, CA 94558$27,681
88Del Campo Vineyard Management IncNapa, CA 94558$27,117
89Shooting Star VineyardsNapa, CA 94559$26,881
90Abel TiradoNapa, CA 94559$25,778
91Clark Claudon Vineyards, LLCSaint Helena, CA 94574$25,367
92Peju Family Operating Partnership LpRutherford, CA 94573$25,337
93Johnson VineyardSaint Helena, CA 94574$25,091
94Mcgah Limited PartnershipAlamo, CA 94507$24,925
95Jack Edward BoydstonSaint Helena, CA 94574$24,750
96Laurent Revocable Trust 2009Saint Helena, CA 94574$23,016
97Gabriela H Hopf Multi-generational TrustFairfax, CA 94930$22,798
98Caroline H. Macdonald Multi-gen TrustMill Valley, CA 94941$22,798
99Pamela D. Horton Multi- Generational TrustSanta Rosa, CA 95409$22,798
100David EaklePope Valley, CA 94567$22,596

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag