Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Napa County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 69
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Napa County, California totaled $1,302,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pope Valley Vista Vineyards LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $105,757 |
2 | Rust Ridge Vineyards | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $100,688 |
3 | Kirkland Cattle Co | Napa, CA 94581 | $95,130 |
4 | J & J Nichelini Vineyards | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $73,295 |
5 | Rancho Sarco Vineyards | Napa, CA 94558 | $61,261 |
6 | Garvey III LLC | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $55,680 |
7 | Rigiwin Ag | Napa, CA 94558 | $51,371 |
8 | Brocap Vineyard Company | Napa, CA 94558 | $49,233 |
9 | Harrison Vineyards Inc | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $49,135 |
10 | Heron Lake Vineyard | Napa, CA 94558 | $45,751 |
11 | Rutherford Vista Vineyard LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $39,489 |
12 | Komes Cypress Ranch | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $37,099 |
13 | Ghisletta Vineyards Limited Partn | Napa, CA 94559 | $35,974 |
14 | Ken Parr | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $34,334 |
15 | James Birkmyer | Napa, CA 94558 | $30,706 |
16 | Giles W Mead | Napa, CA 94558 | $23,276 |
17 | Cal Plans Premium III | San Rafael, CA 94901 | $23,180 |
18 | 1997 James W And Barbara J Richar | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $21,980 |
19 | Green And Red Vnyd LLC | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $21,516 |
20 | Arthur Havenner | Davis, CA 95616 | $18,905 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>