Farm Subsidy information
Napa County, California
Total Subsidies in Napa County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 101
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Napa County, California totaled $9,837,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Calistoga Wine LLC | Sausalito, CA 94965 | $65,537 |
| 22 | Bill Bishop Trust | Napa, CA 94558 | $65,263 |
| 23 | Jack Edward Boydston | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $64,874 |
| 24 | Lee E. Titus & Sons Ltd | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $63,555 |
| 25 | Sandpoint Wines LLC | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $52,857 |
| 26 | Buena Tierra Vineyards Inc | Yountville, CA 94599 | $50,473 |
| 27 | Lucio Dalla Gasperina | Rutherford, CA 94573 | $49,221 |
| 28 | Paul T Garvey | Napa, CA 94558 | $48,147 |
| 29 | Hossfeld Vineyards Inc | Napa, CA 94558 | $46,205 |
| 30 | Bartolucci Andrea | Napa, CA 94559 | $44,880 |
| 31 | Talbot Enterprises, LLC | Oakland, CA 94602 | $44,714 |
| 32 | John J Peterson | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $43,539 |
| 33 | Thomson Vineyards Inc | Napa, CA 94559 | $41,362 |
| 34 | Vine Farm LLC | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $38,860 |
| 35 | Yates 63 LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $37,827 |
| 36 | Curtis Underwood | Napa, CA 94558 | $37,160 |
| 37 | Douglas Wight | Oakville, CA 94562 | $35,756 |
| 38 | Gary Branham | Dixon, CA 95620 | $34,316 |
| 39 | Puamana LLC | Napa, CA 94581 | $32,714 |
| 40 | Tambor Vineyards LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $32,690 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf