Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Napa County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 28
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Napa County, California totaled $403,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pacific Livestock Inc | Davis, CA 95617 | $116,615 |
2 | Bill Bishop Trust | Napa, CA 94558 | $46,282 |
3 | Five Dot Land & Cattle Co | Standish, CA 96128 | $28,245 |
4 | Richard L. Musachia | Wendel, CA 96136 | $26,195 |
5 | Christina Ahmann Roberts Trust | Napa, CA 94559 | $22,822 |
6 | Erica L Ahmann - Ahmann Trust | Napa, CA 94559 | $21,487 |
7 | Anna Maria Ahmann-reed Trust | Napa, CA 94558 | $18,044 |
8 | Douglas P Freitas | Vacaville, CA 95688 | $16,470 |
9 | Linda Bushey | Napa, CA 94558 | $14,739 |
10 | William W Hardin | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $12,219 |
11 | Robert Renati | Sonoma, CA 94931 | $11,347 |
12 | Erica L Ahmann - Ahmann Rev Tr | Napa, CA 94559 | $8,305 |
13 | Jeffrey Becker | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $6,888 |
14 | Lawrence Brumley | Willows, CA 95988 | $6,664 |
15 | , | $6,483 | |
16 | Rick Collins | Calistoga, CA 94515 | $6,314 |
17 | Christina Ahmann Roberts Rev Tr | Napa, CA 94559 | $5,476 |
18 | Anna Maria Ahmann-reed Rev Tr | Napa, CA 94558 | $4,379 |
19 | Kelly Eoff | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $4,186 |
20 | Erica Ahmann Smithies-ahmann Sibl | Napa, CA 94559 | $3,908 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>