Farm Subsidy information
Nevada County, California
Total Subsidies in Nevada County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 134
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Nevada County, California totaled $2,200,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jim Wolter | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $10,421 |
42 | Eric Carr | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $10,235 |
43 | Mark Prechter | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $10,086 |
44 | Crawford Bost | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $10,075 |
45 | Robert I Harvey | Weiser, ID 83672 | $9,861 |
46 | Jim Tryon | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $9,676 |
47 | Daniel G Kemp | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $9,529 |
48 | Jason D Fleming | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $9,304 |
49 | Gary Foster | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $9,088 |
50 | Darryl Sanford | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $8,959 |
51 | Tahoe Donner Association | Truckee, CA 96161 | $8,740 |
52 | George C Bierwagen | Chicago Park, CA 95712 | $8,477 |
53 | Mary Reis | Gridley, CA 95948 | $7,985 |
54 | Kurts Garden Inc | Grass Valley, CA 95949 | $7,458 |
55 | Arlo Acton | North San Juan, CA 95960 | $6,647 |
56 | James Ranch | Penn Valley, CA 95946 | $6,184 |
57 | Saragail Standish | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $5,451 |
58 | Nita Browning | North San Juan, CA 95960 | $5,295 |
59 | Edward B Haven | Grass Valley, CA 95945 | $5,170 |
60 | David Vertin | Nevada City, CA 95959 | $5,120 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”