Total Commodity Programs in Orange County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Orange County, California totaled $841,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Natures Best Farms Inc | Yorba Linda, CA 92886 | $227,831 |
2 | God's Glorious Land Inc. | Irvine, CA 92618 | $119,880 |
3 | Bolsa Nursery | Westminster, CA 92683 | $101,699 |
4 | South Coast Farms Inc | San Clemente, CA 92672 | $87,941 |
5 | Nitao Nursery Inc | Orange, CA 92867 | $86,175 |
6 | Seth G Densmore | Laguna Hills, CA 92653 | $47,007 |
7 | Maehara Nursery, Inc. | Fountain Valley, CA 92708 | $31,752 |
8 | Frank Fitzpatrick | Silverado, CA 92676 | $30,250 |
9 | Tanaka Farms LLC | Irvine, CA 92612 | $26,767 |
10 | Deborah Root | Westminster, CA 92683 | $24,389 |
11 | Craig Jacobs | Huntington Beach, CA 92648 | $13,623 |
12 | Rodger Healy | Capo Beach, CA 92624 | $11,520 |
13 | Rosewood Farms, LLC | Fountain Valley, CA 92708 | $8,811 |
14 | Integrated Healthcare Solutions, Inc. Dba Pucker U | San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 | $8,279 |
15 | Robert Gregory George | Dana Point, CA 92629 | $6,512 |
16 | Steve Wernett | Orange, CA 92867 | $5,931 |
17 | , | $788 | |
18 | Tangut Corporation Dba Puredia Corporation | Irvine, CA 92618 | $550 |
19 | Alovitox Inc. | Lake Forest, CA 92630 | $500 |
20 | Howard C Mc Vicker | Costa Mesa, CA 92627 | $440 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>