Market Gains in Placer County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 75
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Placer County, California totaled $3,882,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Christopher C Burke | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $46,181 |
22 | Alex Koshman Family Irrevocable T | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $44,394 |
23 | A Plus A Inc | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $43,648 |
24 | Marjorie Susan Burke | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $39,969 |
25 | K C Bullock | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | $36,216 |
26 | Brian J Van Dyke | Rio Oso, CA 95674 | $34,389 |
27 | B & B Livestock | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $33,768 |
28 | Virginia D Van Dyke Family Trust | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $32,589 |
29 | William E Bryant | Roseville, CA 95678 | $24,643 |
30 | Wendell G Keenan Jr | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $24,155 |
31 | Plata Farms | Marysville, CA 95901 | $23,931 |
32 | Margret Koshman Irr Trust | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $22,093 |
33 | Kenneth R Carmical | Elverta, CA 95626 | $19,547 |
34 | Denice Lynn Bianchi | Sacramento, CA 95837 | $18,397 |
35 | J Fred Moore Revocable Trust | Davis, CA 95616 | $17,071 |
36 | Calvin Ray Carmical Irr Trust | Elverta, CA 95626 | $16,772 |
37 | Kenny Carmical Irr Trust | Elverta, CA 95626 | $16,772 |
38 | Cynthia D Vogt | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $15,406 |
39 | Laurence Smudski | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $13,442 |
40 | Sophie Hirtz | Lincoln, CA 95648 | $13,381 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”