Farm Subsidy information
Plumas County, California
Total Subsidies in Plumas County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 167
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Plumas County, California totaled $12,592,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Darrell Wood | Vina, CA 96092 | $10,062 |
82 | , | $10,042 | |
83 | Grant A Amen | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $9,810 |
84 | Lynchpin Partners LLC | Cleveland, OH 44122 | $9,393 |
85 | Lane Labbe' | Quincy, CA 95971 | $9,266 |
86 | Kathleen Garr | Colusa, CA 95932 | $9,229 |
87 | Judith L Bradley | Calpine, CA 96124 | $9,048 |
88 | Phillip Noia | Greenville, CA 95947 | $8,822 |
89 | The 1984 Alfred Gassiot Trust | Vinton, CA 96135 | $8,778 |
90 | Andrew Meyers | Greenville, CA 95947 | $8,739 |
91 | Gary Romano | Beckwourth, CA 96129 | $8,607 |
92 | Richard D Leonhardt | Quincy, CA 95971 | $8,549 |
93 | Eddie Hammerich | Greenville, CA 95947 | $8,535 |
94 | Ron Tanner | Reno, NV 89511 | $8,202 |
95 | Linda Hutchison | New Pine Creek, OR 97635 | $8,179 |
96 | John Osmetti | Portola, CA 96122 | $7,922 |
97 | Graeagle Timber Company, LLC | Graeagle, CA 96103 | $7,292 |
98 | Mohawk Valley Properties Inc | Tahoe City, CA 96145 | $7,034 |
99 | John Backer Jr | Wilton, CA 95693 | $6,593 |
100 | Jessica Clarice Arditto | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $6,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”