Emergency Conservation Program in Plumas County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 47
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Plumas County, California totaled $1,034,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joe Egan | Janesville, CA 96114 | $212,870 |
| 2 | Shirley Jeanne Carmichael Family | Grand Junction, CO 81505 | $140,237 |
| 3 | Richard Egan | Susanville, CA 96130 | $99,234 |
| 4 | Gary J Ford | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $91,219 |
| 5 | Monte A Smith | Crescent Mills, CA 95934 | $54,269 |
| 6 | Jason Mcintyre | Taylorsville, CA 95983 | $45,799 |
| 7 | Five Dot Land & Cattle Co | Standish, CA 96128 | $44,291 |
| 8 | Thomasson Livestock | Chico, CA 95973 | $43,273 |
| 9 | Jack Sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $41,230 |
| 10 | Feather River Land Trust | Quincy, CA 95971 | $31,908 |
| 11 | Thomas D Bengard Sr | Salinas, CA 93912 | $30,835 |
| 12 | Thomas C Rogers | Greenville, CA 95947 | $29,121 |
| 13 | Reid Land & Cattle Co LLC | Quincy, CA 95971 | $20,236 |
| 14 | William Metcalf | Taylorsville, CA 95983 | $16,755 |
| 15 | Floyd C Neer & Sons Ranch | Greenville, CA 95947 | $14,226 |
| 16 | Harrison Enterprises | Vinton, CA 96135 | $12,987 |
| 17 | Peggy Corbett | Portola, CA 96122 | $12,750 |
| 18 | Reid Land And Cattle Company | Quincy, CA 95971 | $11,017 |
| 19 | Craig S Mc Henry | Loyalton, CA 96118 | $10,138 |
| 20 | Kathleen Garr | Colusa, CA 95932 | $9,229 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
