Farm Subsidy information
Plumas County, California
Total Subsidies in Plumas County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 167
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Plumas County, California totaled $12,592,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Roberti Ranch | Loyalton, CA 96118 | $1,050,339 |
2 | George Goodwin Family Lp | Beckwourth, CA 96129 | $907,887 |
3 | Richard Egan | Susanville, CA 96130 | $790,417 |
4 | Joe Egan | Janesville, CA 96114 | $436,424 |
5 | Sierra Land Management Inc | Redding, CA 96002 | $359,027 |
6 | J W Bamford Inc | Oroville, CA 95965 | $317,008 |
7 | E Roen Ranches | Knights Ferry, CA 95361 | $251,426 |
8 | Erik O Roen Family Trust U/a/d August 27, 2004 | Knights Ferry, CA 95361 | $249,998 |
9 | Pitchfork Cattle Co | Vinton, CA 96135 | $231,003 |
10 | Jack Sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $227,942 |
11 | Harry J Rogers | Greenville, CA 95947 | $223,548 |
12 | Greg Ramelli | Portola, CA 96122 | $214,696 |
13 | Collins Pine Company | Chester, CA 96020 | $171,932 |
14 | Talbott Sheep Company LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $167,500 |
15 | Shirley Jeanne Carmichael Family | Grand Junction, CO 81505 | $153,381 |
16 | Jason Mcintyre | Taylorsville, CA 95983 | $137,460 |
17 | Albert John Roen | Sierraville, CA 96126 | $124,250 |
18 | Monte A Smith | Crescent Mills, CA 95934 | $114,333 |
19 | Bryan Williams | Vinton, CA 96135 | $111,433 |
20 | Gary J Ford | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $107,211 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>