Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Riverside County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 132
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Riverside County, California totaled $6,273,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tres Amigos Viejos LLC | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $68,765 |
22 | Jorge A Torres | Coachella, CA 92236 | $67,472 |
23 | Prospect Ranch LLC | Placentia, CA 92870 | $66,216 |
24 | Soboba Citrus | Reno, NV 89521 | $66,006 |
25 | Domenigoni Bros Ranch Lp | Winchester, CA 92596 | $65,245 |
26 | Mjh Enterprises Inc | Thermal, CA 92274 | $62,769 |
27 | Belmont Farms Inc | Palm Desert, CA 92255 | $58,599 |
28 | Peninsula Farms LLC | Newport Beach, CA 92660 | $56,862 |
29 | William Vito Bruno | Nuevo, CA 92567 | $55,122 |
30 | Lucky Charm Farms Inc | Incline Village, NV 89451 | $54,958 |
31 | Coxco LLC | Blythe, CA 92225 | $54,711 |
32 | Symphony Orchids Corp | Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 | $53,988 |
33 | Rogelio Vargas | Thermal, CA 92274 | $50,622 |
34 | Blue Banner Company Inc | Riverside, CA 92502 | $50,000 |
35 | Rosemarie Corona Inc | Temecula, CA 92592 | $48,596 |
36 | Alfred V Visco Jr | Rolling Hills, CA 90274 | $46,838 |
37 | Chaffin Farms | Blythe, CA 92225 | $45,058 |
38 | Full Season Ag, Inc | Hemet, CA 92545 | $43,196 |
39 | Melkesian Ranch Inc | Thermal, CA 92274 | $42,371 |
40 | Blair Ranch LLC | Coachella, CA 92236 | $41,983 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”