Market Loss Assistance Program in Riverside County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 189
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Riverside County, California totaled $10,850,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chairel Custom Hay Inc | Blythe, CA 92226 | $104,764 |
22 | Domenigoni Bros Ranch Lp | Winchester, CA 92596 | $103,012 |
23 | A & E Sheep Co Inc | Moreno Valley, CA 92553 | $99,011 |
24 | Jimenez Farms | Florence, AZ 85232 | $97,297 |
25 | Phil Rheingans | Moscow, ID 83843 | $95,951 |
26 | Heather Rheingans | Moscow, ID 83843 | $95,951 |
27 | Triple Will Farms | Blythe, CA 92225 | $93,658 |
28 | The Cox Family Trust Dtd 100508 | Blythe, CA 92225 | $93,171 |
29 | Nish Noroian Farms | Blythe, CA 92226 | $92,832 |
30 | Fisher Ranch III | Blythe, CA 92225 | $79,552 |
31 | Rio Rancho 2000 LLC | Blythe, CA 92226 | $71,713 |
32 | Andrew Van Sickle | Blythe, CA 92226 | $69,911 |
33 | Pedro Ma Indacochea | Wildomar, CA 92595 | $61,919 |
34 | Cow-west Dairy | Hereford, TX 79045 | $54,626 |
35 | Vermeer & Goedhart Dairy | Shafter, CA 93263 | $51,404 |
36 | Desperado Farms | Blythe, CA 92225 | $50,769 |
37 | Joe Van Dyke | Blythe, CA 92225 | $49,608 |
38 | De Vuyst Farms Aka Red River Dairy | Pampa, TX 79066 | $47,662 |
39 | Rolanco Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $45,355 |
40 | Hein Hettinga Dairies | Ontario, CA 91762 | $43,708 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”