Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Riverside County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 132
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Riverside County, California totaled $6,273,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Chairel Custom Hay Inc | Blythe, CA 92226 | $23,301 |
62 | Mary Corona | Temecula, CA 92592 | $22,436 |
63 | Mary Jeanne Humboldt | Riverside, CA 92504 | $21,295 |
64 | Aziz Farms Inc | Thermal, CA 92274 | $19,749 |
65 | 4-w Canyon Ranch Group LLC | Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 | $19,618 |
66 | J & J Ranch Produce Inc | Indio, CA 92202 | $19,144 |
67 | Junior Enterprises LLC | Coachella, CA 92236 | $19,053 |
68 | Stroschein Family Trust Dba Stanl | Blythe, CA 92226 | $18,724 |
69 | Donald S Bean | Nuevo, CA 92567 | $16,291 |
70 | Dennis Washburn | Hemet, CA 92544 | $16,066 |
71 | Mcsweeny Farms | Hemet, CA 92543 | $15,749 |
72 | Rio Rancho | Mecca, CA 92254 | $15,295 |
73 | Heraclio Montauez | Thermal, CA 92274 | $15,137 |
74 | Kurt Gunther | Riverside, CA 92504 | $15,100 |
75 | Enrique Berriozabal | Thermal, CA 92274 | $14,586 |
76 | Vmv Ranch | Mecca, CA 92254 | $14,486 |
77 | Anthony Bianco | Palm Desert, CA 92211 | $13,953 |
78 | Moe Taheri | Marietta, GA 30066 | $12,675 |
79 | Richard W Dill | Blythe, CA 92226 | $12,634 |
80 | Painted Canyon Ranches | Mecca, CA 92254 | $12,185 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”