Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Riverside County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 132
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Riverside County, California totaled $6,273,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Lydia Reese Dba Meljess Bees | Winchester, CA 92596 | $11,922 |
82 | Desert Fresh Inc | Coachella, CA 92236 | $11,702 |
83 | Cuc T Tran | Seal Beach, CA 90740 | $11,122 |
84 | Alan Washburn | Riverside, CA 92507 | $11,066 |
85 | Wake Farms LLC | Riverside, CA 92504 | $10,567 |
86 | Tudor Ranch Inc | Mecca, CA 92254 | $10,419 |
87 | Manfred O Maul | Temecula, CA 92590 | $10,171 |
88 | Mary Ann Kemp | Campo, CA 91906 | $9,348 |
89 | C K C Orchards | Temecula, CA 92593 | $9,287 |
90 | Susan R Egge | Temecula, CA 92590 | $9,161 |
91 | Samuel D Cobb | Desert Hot Springs, CA 92241 | $8,824 |
92 | Elliott & Hull | Blythe, CA 92225 | $8,334 |
93 | Island Cuvee Wine Co., Inc | Temecula, CA 92592 | $8,207 |
94 | Sunmist Fruit | Rowland Heights, CA 91748 | $6,290 |
95 | Kara Brandt | Temecula, CA 92590 | $5,560 |
96 | Jorge Alberto Arvizu | Blythe, CA 92225 | $5,472 |
97 | Marcel Jerry Guilin | Blythe, CA 92225 | $5,381 |
98 | Gerson Marmolejo | Thermal, CA 92274 | $5,300 |
99 | Saul Fuentes | Indio, CA 92201 | $5,300 |
100 | Hayden O'donnell Dba Goodie Farms | Cherry Valley, CA 92223 | $5,295 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”