Market Loss Assistance Program in Riverside County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 189
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Riverside County, California totaled $10,850,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Brothers Three Dairy | Ontario, CA 91762 | $34,512 |
82 | Ron Pietersma Dba Legend Dairy Farms | Chino, CA 91708 | $34,512 |
83 | John Bootsma Dairy | Lakeview, CA 92567 | $34,512 |
84 | Ed P Vander Woude Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $34,512 |
85 | Pete Vanderham Dairy Inc | Hereford, TX 79045 | $34,512 |
86 | Kasbergen Dairy | Mansfield, IL 61854 | $34,512 |
87 | Pete Oostdam & Son Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $34,512 |
88 | Van Dam Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $34,512 |
89 | Dutch Girl Dairy Farm | Ontario, CA 91762 | $34,512 |
90 | Michel Minaberry Dairy | Ontario, CA 91762 | $34,512 |
91 | John Oostdam & Son Dairy | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $34,512 |
92 | Pablo Echeverria Dairy | Corona, CA 92880 | $34,512 |
93 | Newhouse Dairy | Bakersfield, CA 93313 | $34,512 |
94 | Souza Dairies | Chino, CA 91708 | $34,512 |
95 | William Koot Dairy | Winchester, CA 92596 | $34,512 |
96 | Gorzeman Diary | Chino, CA 91710 | $34,512 |
97 | H & C Dairy | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $34,512 |
98 | Boersma Dairy | Winchester, CA 92596 | $34,512 |
99 | Minaberry Dairy No 1 | Ontario, CA 91762 | $34,512 |
100 | John H Boere Dairy | Menifee, CA 92584 | $34,512 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”