Oilseed Program in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 121
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $241,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Juana Rodriguez | Isleton, CA 95641 | $1,158 |
42 | Jaime Rodriguez Jr | Isleton, CA 95641 | $1,158 |
43 | Hanna Family Trust | Shelton, WA 98584 | $905 |
44 | Georgiana Farms | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $891 |
45 | Thomas Mccormack | Douglas, WY 82633 | $755 |
46 | William Correa Jr | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $743 |
47 | Mccormack Glannvale Ranch | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $711 |
48 | Wilcox Brothers Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $692 |
49 | Wallace Chan | Courtland, CA 95615 | $659 |
50 | Edward De Matei Jr | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $656 |
51 | Dennis Leary Revocable Trust | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $642 |
52 | Christie & Stoll | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $575 |
53 | Wilhelmine Langhart Trust | San Jose, CA 95120 | $524 |
54 | R W Langhart Trust | San Jose, CA 95120 | $524 |
55 | Tom Stokes | Lodi, CA 95242 | $520 |
56 | Charles F Mcdowell | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $474 |
57 | Lavenson Properties | Palo Alto, CA 94301 | $453 |
58 | Siddiqui Family Partnership | Sacramento, CA 95811 | $429 |
59 | Candido F Rosa-testmentary Trust | Elk Grove, CA 95759 | $406 |
60 | Jaime Rodriguez | Isleton, CA 95641 | $319 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”