Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 117
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $3,855,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Robert Mehrten | Sloughhouse, CA 95683 | $2,809 |
82 | James Burnett | Acampo, CA 95220 | $2,753 |
83 | Douglas Newland | Colusa, CA 95932 | $2,606 |
84 | Gary Silva Jr | Herald, CA 95638 | $2,574 |
85 | Lana Houck | Herald, CA 95638 | $2,542 |
86 | , | $2,481 | |
87 | John Wells | Elk Grove, CA 95759 | $2,288 |
88 | Brad Ruble | Raymond, CA 93653 | $2,288 |
89 | James Danekas | Wilton, CA 95693 | $2,118 |
90 | Hal C J Johnsrud III | Mandaree, ND 58757 | $2,076 |
91 | Jim Barker Dismukes II | Checotah, OK 74426 | $1,840 |
92 | Brien Moules | Herald, CA 95638 | $1,633 |
93 | Lloyd Oneto | Ione, CA 95640 | $1,228 |
94 | Jt Cattle Company | Elk Grove, CA 95624 | $1,128 |
95 | Hardesty Cattle Company | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $1,097 |
96 | Luis A Pimentel Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $1,066 |
97 | Esther Mello | Rancho Murieta, CA 95683 | $1,050 |
98 | Pimentel Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $1,023 |
99 | Joe Mattos | Isleton, CA 95641 | $959 |
100 | Norman Waters | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $776 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”