Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 183
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $6,701,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Anthony Van Steyn | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $12,837 |
102 | Quinn Patrick Mulrooney | Galt, CA 95632 | $12,158 |
103 | Roemer Farms | Sacramento, CA 95829 | $11,973 |
104 | Trilogy Homes Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $11,575 |
105 | La Verne Scheidel | Elverta, CA 95626 | $10,973 |
106 | Frederick J Durst | Woodland, CA 95695 | $10,355 |
107 | Double M Farms Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $9,306 |
108 | Elk Grove Milling Inc | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $9,293 |
109 | Greg Marriott | Herald, CA 95638 | $8,998 |
110 | Kurtis J Bianchi | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $8,761 |
111 | Hofman Joint Venture | Wheatland, CA 95692 | $8,663 |
112 | Maria Arellano | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $8,400 |
113 | Adhemar Arellano | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $8,400 |
114 | Denier Revocable Trust | Galt, CA 95632 | $8,358 |
115 | Lind Brothers | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $7,914 |
116 | Samra Family Trust | Elk Grove, CA 95624 | $7,777 |
117 | John Allen | Oakland, CA 94618 | $7,636 |
118 | Mark Beck | Acampo, CA 95220 | $7,562 |
119 | Harvey J Correia | Isleton, CA 95641 | $7,492 |
120 | Wurster Ranches Lp | Granite Bay, CA 95746 | $7,381 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”