Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 183

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $6,701,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
141Siddiqui Family PartnershipSacramento, CA 95811$3,976
142Michael JensenStockton, CA 95207$3,267
143Charles JensenStockton, CA 95207$3,267
144James C JensenStockton, CA 95207$3,267
145A J J & M MarksSacramento, CA 95819$3,231
146Timothy R CarpenterElk Grove, CA 95758$2,847
147Bradley CharamugaRio Vista, CA 94571$2,847
148Ronald L KelleySacramento, CA 95831$2,729
149Hardesty Cattle CompanyElk Grove, CA 95757$2,704
150Joe MattosIsleton, CA 95641$2,675
151Lind Family Survivors Irrevocable TrustWalnut Grove, CA 95690$2,454
152Phyllis Joyce Pappa TrustWest Sacramento, CA 95691$2,228
153Don & Sue Rosa Family 2003 RevocaDiamond Springs, CA 95619$2,228
154Mcelvain Family TrustWalnut Grove, CA 95690$2,070
155Steven Todd GarciaIone, CA 95640$1,977
156Stone Farms LLCIsleton, CA 95641$1,777
157Walter A Kessler Bay Meadow FarmsGalt, CA 95632$1,510
158Wallace Chan Farms IncCourtland, CA 95615$1,455
159Javed SiddiquiOrangevale, CA 95662$1,359
160Amna SiddiquiSacramento, CA 95811$1,359

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag