Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 135
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $7,568,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Van Steyn Dairy | Galt, CA 95632 | $609,935 |
2 | Van Warmerdam Dairy Inc | Galt, CA 95632 | $588,518 |
3 | The Fishery | Galt, CA 95632 | $500,000 |
4 | B & J Dairy Lp | Galt, CA 95632 | $500,000 |
5 | New Hope Dairy LLC | Galt, CA 95632 | $500,000 |
6 | Cal-denier Dairy LLC | Galt, CA 95632 | $461,436 |
7 | Joe M Simoes & Sons Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $376,839 |
8 | Duane F Martin Jr | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $250,000 |
9 | Gary Silva Sr | Herald, CA 95638 | $190,688 |
10 | Helen Mello | Galt, CA 95632 | $183,501 |
11 | Tony Mello | Galt, CA 95632 | $183,408 |
12 | J & M Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $168,238 |
13 | Duarte Family Dairy Inc | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $161,704 |
14 | Joe Mattos | Isleton, CA 95641 | $153,087 |
15 | Lisa Mello | Galt, CA 95632 | $143,256 |
16 | Kevin R. Mello | Galt, CA 95632 | $143,062 |
17 | Pimentel Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $138,057 |
18 | Jason Mahon | Herald, CA 95638 | $118,438 |
19 | Freshwater Fish Inc | Wilton, CA 95693 | $114,356 |
20 | Luis A Pimentel Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $107,170 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>