Market Loss Assistance Program in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 564
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $17,004,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Silva Farms Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $136,866 |
22 | Richter Farms Trust | Roseville, CA 95661 | $136,378 |
23 | Sherman West Company | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $136,354 |
24 | Top Pro Farms Inc | Elk Grove, CA 95758 | $136,223 |
25 | Jacob W Dewit | El Macero, CA 95618 | $134,451 |
26 | John Dewit Dba John Dewit Farms | Davis, CA 95618 | $134,357 |
27 | Michael J Dewit | Davis, CA 95616 | $134,357 |
28 | Jacob Dewit | Burley, ID 83318 | $134,357 |
29 | Dewit Family Farms | El Macero, CA 95618 | $134,357 |
30 | Laurie Borges Sopwith | Sacramento, CA 95864 | $133,398 |
31 | Kurtis J Bianchi | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $132,986 |
32 | Davis & Sopwith Inc | Sacramento, CA 95825 | $131,459 |
33 | Dayly Lee | Sacramento, CA 95831 | $130,563 |
34 | Metro Farms Inc | Sacramento, CA 95837 | $129,604 |
35 | Red Baron Ranches Inc | Sacramento, CA 95836 | $128,445 |
36 | Amistad Ranches | Courtland, CA 95615 | $127,244 |
37 | Mcdowell Farms Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $126,821 |
38 | Larry Del Chiaro | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $126,574 |
39 | Andrea Investments | Granite Bay, CA 95746 | $126,298 |
40 | Jaime Rodriguez | Isleton, CA 95641 | $123,448 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”