Production Flexibility Program in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 600
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $29,751,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John Dewit Dba John Dewit Farms | Davis, CA 95618 | $258,020 |
22 | Michael J Dewit | Davis, CA 95616 | $258,020 |
23 | Jacob Dewit | Burley, ID 83318 | $258,020 |
24 | Dewit Family Farms | El Macero, CA 95618 | $258,020 |
25 | Davis & Sopwith Inc | Sacramento, CA 95825 | $256,181 |
26 | Richter Farms Trust | Roseville, CA 95661 | $253,031 |
27 | Metro Farms Inc | Sacramento, CA 95837 | $251,913 |
28 | Laurie Borges Sopwith | Sacramento, CA 95864 | $249,212 |
29 | Ag Revocable Trust | Willows, CA 95988 | $249,197 |
30 | Kurtis J Bianchi | Pleasant Grove, CA 95668 | $248,112 |
31 | Jaime Rodriguez | Isleton, CA 95641 | $246,967 |
32 | Ramona Rodriguez | Isleton, CA 95641 | $246,962 |
33 | Larry Del Chiaro | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $241,928 |
34 | Demeter Corp | Rio Linda, CA 95673 | $241,512 |
35 | Ferriera Estate Co Lp | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $239,903 |
36 | Jeffrey S Norton Trust | Robbins, CA 95676 | $239,208 |
37 | Mcdowell Farms Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $236,508 |
38 | Andrea Investments | Granite Bay, CA 95746 | $235,650 |
39 | Amistad Ranches | Courtland, CA 95615 | $235,227 |
40 | Crescent Farming Company | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $234,976 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”