Total Commodity Programs in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,291
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $151,715,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dayly Lee | Sacramento, CA 95831 | $851,713 |
42 | Ramona Rodriguez | Isleton, CA 95641 | $847,607 |
43 | Ag Revocable Trust | Willows, CA 95988 | $813,269 |
44 | Bastiao Farms Inc | Sacramento, CA 95834 | $803,680 |
45 | Jacob W Dewit | El Macero, CA 95618 | $801,034 |
46 | Kay Dix Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $778,912 |
47 | Douglas Chan | Courtland, CA 95615 | $757,850 |
48 | Dennis Katsuki | Isleton, CA 95641 | $747,930 |
49 | Davis & Sopwith Inc | Sacramento, CA 95825 | $727,906 |
50 | Dennis R Johnson | Herald, CA 95638 | $725,881 |
51 | Crescent Farming Company | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $715,873 |
52 | Pimentel Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $715,698 |
53 | La Verne Scheidel | Elverta, CA 95626 | $699,685 |
54 | L Ceccarini & Son | Galt, CA 95632 | $695,054 |
55 | Ose Properties No 3 | Sacramento, CA 95825 | $694,401 |
56 | Denis Van De Maele | Isleton, CA 95641 | $679,428 |
57 | Willey & Willey Farms Inc | Rocklin, CA 95677 | $671,922 |
58 | Ferriera Estate Co Lp | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $639,719 |
59 | Mitchell C Spaletta | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $635,387 |
60 | Hunn & Merwin & Merwin Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $634,457 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”