Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in San Benito County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 66
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in San Benito County, California totaled $402,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Peterson Land & Cattle | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $6,273 |
22 | Robert Bianchi | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $6,115 |
23 | Erica Lynn Bianchi | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $5,040 |
24 | Donald Trinchero | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $4,733 |
25 | Vern Scattini | King City, CA 93930 | $4,687 |
26 | , | $4,497 | |
27 | Dean Bell | Hollister, CA 95023 | $4,492 |
28 | Charles Snyder | Hollister, CA 95023 | $4,483 |
29 | Amy K Strohn | Paicines, CA 95043 | $4,271 |
30 | Agco Hay LLC | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $4,142 |
31 | Frederick Flook | Hollister, CA 95023 | $3,932 |
32 | Alex Naccarato Jr | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $3,797 |
33 | Marc Stelling | Hollister, CA 95023 | $3,742 |
34 | Robin L Rist | King City, CA 93930 | $3,426 |
35 | Lloyd Ray Beadle | Los Gatos, CA 95032 | $3,419 |
36 | Summit Ranch LLC | Paicines, CA 95043 | $3,412 |
37 | Robert Steven Taylor | Paicines, CA 95043 | $3,288 |
38 | William J Donati | Hollister, CA 95023 | $2,936 |
39 | T.o. Cattle Company LLC | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $2,864 |
40 | 3j Cattle Company LLC | Penngrove, CA 94951 | $2,794 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”