Non-insured Disaster Assistance in San Benito County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 129
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in San Benito County, California totaled $5,983,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Frank Jr Farms LLC | Hollister, CA 95023 | $42,863 |
42 | M And J French Ranch LLC | Hollister, CA 95024 | $39,225 |
43 | Wayne Shingai | Hollister, CA 95023 | $38,675 |
44 | Cantua Creek Cattle Co | Hanford, CA 93232 | $36,260 |
45 | Scott Joseph Spencer | Paicines, CA 95043 | $35,207 |
46 | J Michael Shields | Paicines, CA 95043 | $31,950 |
47 | F R Baumgartner & Sons | Paicines, CA 95043 | $31,482 |
48 | Todd Sans | Paicines, CA 95043 | $31,057 |
49 | William C Rist | King City, CA 93930 | $29,769 |
50 | Five Oaks Ptshp Dba Spur Ranch | King City, CA 93930 | $27,168 |
51 | Joanne Falsey | Paicines, CA 95043 | $26,975 |
52 | John Hubbell | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $26,724 |
53 | Lue Ellen Zgragen | Paicines, CA 95043 | $26,405 |
54 | Nancy I Morris | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $25,723 |
55 | Frank R Zgragen | Paicines, CA 95043 | $24,667 |
56 | Pat Perry | Salinas, CA 93908 | $21,636 |
57 | William J Donati | Hollister, CA 95023 | $19,716 |
58 | Harold Eade Jr | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $19,348 |
59 | Joe Mattos | Isleton, CA 95641 | $18,599 |
60 | Juan Amparan | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $18,442 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”