Farm Subsidy information
San Benito County, California
Total Subsidies in San Benito County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 567
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in San Benito County, California totaled $60,327,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Chad E Zgragen | Paicines, CA 95043 | $235,159 |
42 | Swank Farms Produce Inc | Hollister, CA 95023 | $234,745 |
43 | Casa De Fruta Orchards | Hollister, CA 95023 | $234,575 |
44 | Vern Scattini | King City, CA 93930 | $230,209 |
45 | Helen Matulich | Paicines, CA 95043 | $223,987 |
46 | Peterson Land & Cattle | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $223,772 |
47 | Nino Ranch LLC | King City, CA 93930 | $219,433 |
48 | Robert Swanson | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $216,374 |
49 | Summit Ranch LLC | Paicines, CA 95043 | $199,489 |
50 | Frank Casillas Jr | Hollister, CA 95024 | $196,189 |
51 | Martin Wayne Seiler | Hollister, CA 95024 | $187,854 |
52 | Humboldt West Inc | Hollister, CA 95023 | $175,996 |
53 | Todd Sans | Paicines, CA 95043 | $175,864 |
54 | 101 Livestock Market Inc. | Aromas, CA 95004 | $175,712 |
55 | Les Sans | Paicines, CA 95043 | $175,704 |
56 | Jm M Farms | Salinas, CA 93915 | $174,964 |
57 | Marsha Habib | Hollister, CA 95023 | $170,483 |
58 | R & G Farms Dba Valley Top | Hollister, CA 95024 | $170,066 |
59 | Robert E Simonin | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $167,838 |
60 | John Hubbell | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $166,890 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”