Total Commodity Programs in San Benito County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 122
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in San Benito County, California totaled $3,084,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bonnie E. Carroll | Paicines, CA 95043 | $10,032 |
42 | Jeff Hall | Hollister, CA 95023 | $9,874 |
43 | Robert Coffelt | Hollister, CA 95023 | $9,801 |
44 | Mr Thomas Paul Nino | Hollister, CA 95023 | $9,723 |
45 | Everyday Greens | Hollister, CA 95023 | $9,319 |
46 | Tyler Justin Jewell | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $9,205 |
47 | Thomas E Dotta | Hollister, CA 95023 | $8,827 |
48 | Mccullough Cattle Company | Paicines, CA 95043 | $8,737 |
49 | Samuel Lippert | Paicines, CA 95043 | $8,438 |
50 | William A Derosa | Paicines, CA 95043 | $7,778 |
51 | Todd Sans | Paicines, CA 95043 | $7,650 |
52 | Five Oaks Ptshp Dba Spur Ranch | King City, CA 93930 | $7,350 |
53 | Edward C Strohn | Paicines, CA 95043 | $7,245 |
54 | Gildarlo Jose Espana-garcia | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $7,189 |
55 | 101 Equipment Co. | Aromas, CA 95004 | $6,799 |
56 | William J Donati | Hollister, CA 95023 | $6,653 |
57 | John L Schwabacher Jr | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $6,452 |
58 | Victor N. Anyeneh | Hollister, CA 95023 | $6,311 |
59 | Michael Johnson | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $5,981 |
60 | Robert Nino | Hollister, CA 95023 | $5,894 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”