Total Disaster Programs in San Benito County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 401
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in San Benito County, California totaled $20,495,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Wayne Shingai | Hollister, CA 95023 | $38,675 |
102 | Blackburn Farms III Lp | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $37,980 |
103 | Joe Mattos | Isleton, CA 95641 | $37,291 |
104 | , | $37,018 | |
105 | William O Stone | Paicines, CA 95043 | $36,017 |
106 | Juan Amparan | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $35,167 |
107 | Isidoro Mendoza | Paicines, CA 95043 | $34,670 |
108 | Amy K Strohn | Paicines, CA 95043 | $34,048 |
109 | Diamond Sheep Company Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93390 | $30,948 |
110 | John Hain And Sons | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $30,476 |
111 | Anthony Freitas | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $30,309 |
112 | Lloyd Ray Beadle | Los Gatos, CA 95032 | $30,111 |
113 | Speedling Inc | Sun City, FL 33586 | $30,000 |
114 | Alvand Investment | Los Gatos, CA 95032 | $29,760 |
115 | Soap Lake Ranch LLC | Fremont, CA 94538 | $28,880 |
116 | Joseph Serpa | Hollister, CA 95023 | $28,877 |
117 | Robert Steven Taylor | Paicines, CA 95043 | $28,542 |
118 | M & M Farms | Hollister, CA 95023 | $28,221 |
119 | Michael Johnson | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $28,060 |
120 | Pete Larrondo | Hollister, CA 95023 | $27,346 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”