Market Loss Assistance Program in San Benito County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 85
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in San Benito County, California totaled $1,084,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Leon & Grace Urrutia | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $113,254 |
2 | Albert Silva | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $111,907 |
3 | Talbott Sheep Company LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $72,025 |
4 | Scagliotti Farms | Hollister, CA 95023 | $63,652 |
5 | Five Oaks Ptshp Dba Spur Ranch | King City, CA 93930 | $57,726 |
6 | Hog Farms Inc | Spreckels, CA 93962 | $53,326 |
7 | Las Aguilas Corp | Hollister, CA 95024 | $52,099 |
8 | Robert Swanson | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $47,866 |
9 | Beverly Tobias | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $46,947 |
10 | G R Acquistapace Dairy | Hollister, CA 95023 | $34,512 |
11 | Mccullough Brothers | Paicines, CA 95043 | $28,234 |
12 | 3-d Dairy | Hollister, CA 95023 | $28,095 |
13 | Casillas Brothers Ptshp | Hollister, CA 95024 | $25,885 |
14 | Stirewalt Farm And Truck | Hollister, CA 95023 | $24,115 |
15 | John Bourdet | Hollister, CA 95023 | $21,808 |
16 | John Maggini | King City, CA 93930 | $20,612 |
17 | John Hubbell | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $18,779 |
18 | Robert Pereira | Hollister, CA 95023 | $17,256 |
19 | Tim Pereira | Hollister, CA 95023 | $17,256 |
20 | M & M Farms | Hollister, CA 95023 | $12,879 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>