Farm Subsidy information
San Bernardino County, California
Total Subsidies in San Bernardino County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 729
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in San Bernardino County, California totaled $82,358,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Bekendam Dairy | Ontario, CA 91761 | $123,861 |
162 | Van Hofwegen Dairy | Chino, CA 91710 | $121,876 |
163 | Cottonwood Dairy | Chino, CA 91710 | $121,776 |
164 | , | $121,242 | |
165 | Robert C Ashworth II | Loma Linda, CA 92354 | $119,774 |
166 | 3 Palms Dairy | Ontario, CA 91762 | $119,762 |
167 | Jeff Jaynes | Highland, CA 92346 | $119,550 |
168 | Van Veen Dairy | Ontario, CA 91761 | $118,127 |
169 | Gold Star Dairy | Chino, CA 91710 | $117,622 |
170 | Jess Ranch Development Company, I | Apple Valley, CA 92308 | $117,407 |
171 | Udderly Gold Dairy | Hagerman, ID 83332 | $117,352 |
172 | Dick Van Dam Jr Dairy | Chino, CA 91710 | $116,342 |
173 | Brothers Three Dairy | Ontario, CA 91762 | $112,134 |
174 | J & D Wilson & Sons Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $110,222 |
175 | Van Vliet Dairy | Corona, CA 92880 | $109,352 |
176 | Robinson Calf Ranch | Chino, CA 91708 | $108,466 |
177 | Antonio Rodriguez | Ontario, CA 91762 | $107,691 |
178 | Reidman Holsteins | Norco, CA 92860 | $107,650 |
179 | T & W Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $107,628 |
180 | Gerald Osterkamp Dairy | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $105,684 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”