Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in San Bernardino County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 37 of 37
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in San Bernardino County, California totaled $2,478,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | James Jongsma Dairy | Pixley, CA 93256 | $27,228 |
| 22 | Harter Farms LLC | Needles, CA 92363 | $21,774 |
| 23 | Bryan And Sons, LLC | Ontario, CA 91761 | $18,429 |
| 24 | Van Dam Family Trust | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $18,099 |
| 25 | Jennifer Van Dam | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $13,578 |
| 26 | Labrucherie Brothers, LLC | Ontario, CA 91761 | $13,551 |
| 27 | Souza Dairies | Chino, CA 91708 | $11,191 |
| 28 | Blake Archibek | Newberry Springs, CA 92365 | $10,705 |
| 29 | Simoes Family Dairy | Ontario, CA 91761 | $10,456 |
| 30 | Green Valley Food Products Inc | Barstow, CA 92311 | $8,580 |
| 31 | Cleveland Farms Inc | Chino, CA 91708 | $7,671 |
| 32 | Rosequist Farms Inc | Las Vegas, NV 89139 | $7,662 |
| 33 | Alan L Dejong | Newberry Springs, CA 92365 | $6,453 |
| 34 | Batista Bros Dairy Farm Inc | Chino, CA 91710 | $4,756 |
| 35 | Michael Martin | Newberry Springs, CA 92365 | $1,734 |
| 36 | Western Horizon Assoc Inc | Five Points, CA 93624 | $1,466 |
| 37 | Michael Martin | Newberry Springs, CA 92365 | $578 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf