Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in San Diego County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 110
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in San Diego County, California totaled $6,571,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Hass Heights Growers Inc | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $14,618 |
62 | Jd Farms | Carlsbad, CA 92011 | $14,251 |
63 | Joseph Zenovic Jr | El Cajon, CA 92022 | $12,898 |
64 | Exotica Nursery Corporation | Vista, CA 92084 | $12,801 |
65 | Rancho De La Loma | Escondido, CA 92033 | $12,275 |
66 | John Burr III | Escondido, CA 92027 | $12,050 |
67 | Lee Tyler Bilyk | Valley Center, CA 92082 | $11,893 |
68 | Mark Wiener | Long Beach, CA 90803 | $11,066 |
69 | David Bishop | Valley Center, CA 92082 | $10,820 |
70 | Joseph James Rossi | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $10,704 |
71 | Michael Matthew Mellano | Oceanside, CA 92056 | $10,370 |
72 | Francis J Pedace | La Jolla, CA 92037 | $10,135 |
73 | Earl W Rutz | Pauma Valley, CA 92061 | $10,061 |
74 | Kathryn Johnson | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $8,934 |
75 | China Grove LLC | Poway, CA 92064 | $8,395 |
76 | James Ponchetti | Santa Ysabel, CA 92070 | $8,250 |
77 | Battista Castellano | Oceanside, CA 92057 | $8,184 |
78 | Bruce H. Vandenburgh | Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 | $7,446 |
79 | Spangler Peak Ranch Inc | Escondido, CA 92033 | $7,318 |
80 | Kurt Bantle | Carlsbad, CA 92008 | $6,966 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”